The bottom corner says "Copyright MDCDIII" which is... 1903! The cover is really beautiful and antique-looking and will make a good decoration for my wall (it's fallen off anyway). As was popular back then, the music is supposed to represent events in a story. Inside the cover there's a wordy description of the events described by the music and instructions for how the different parts should be played, and in the music itself there's corresponding notes letting you know where you are in the story:INTRO. Dash of the Charioteers for Position. Con Brilliant.
The Race.
Finish of the Race.
Parade of the Victors. Grandioso.
TRIO. Populace Dispersing.
Evening Song of the Christians, dolce
Alarm of Fire, fff
People in Consternation, furioso.
Second Alarm
People in Panic.
People rush wildly through the streets.
Fire fiercely Raging, fff
Crash of falling walls.
...and then it reprises the beginning, concluding with "a grand finale that is thoroughly in keeping with the spirit, life, and enthusiasm of the occasion that is being described" in the words of the description.
The piece itself sounds like the accompaniment you sometimes hear in old silent films; in fact another piece by this guy, "The Chariot Race", was used in the accompaniment to the silent version of Ben-Hur (though it was published before the film). You can hear the piece here (midi file... also the player added some ragtime embellishments towards the end... the composer wasn't that cool). I'm surprised how much I like it, it would actually be pretty fun to play.
Yesterday was my actual birthday. I spent pretty much the whole day installing programs for microtonal tunings and then playing with the results. My friend Damon has been bugging me to produce more microtonal music since I posted my first quarter-tone piece, and anyway I wanted to just screw around for awhile and further procrastinate CD recording. Once I got the programs running (Scala [www.xs4all.nl/~huygensf/scala] and Scala 2 SynthEdit Microtuner [www.12equalboresme.com]) I had to sit down and work out what note frequencies I wanted to map to the keyboard keys. My first keyboard mapping scheme was kind of hard to play with and I ended up laying awake for much of the night thinking about the problem and rearranging the notes first thing in the morning. Here's what I came up with -- boldface represents black keys:
KEYBOARD LEFT HALF:
1 (base note, C)
16/15 of the base note's frequency
9/8
6/5
5/4
27/20
45/32
3/2
8/5
27/16
9/5
15/8
2
KEYBOARD RIGHT HALF:
1
25/24
10/9
7/6
32/27
4/3
25/18
40/27
Average of 14/9 and 25/16
5/3
7/4
16/9
2
(In the first version I found that 14/9 and 25/16 were practically indistinguishable, so I decided to combine them.) The notes come from a modified version of Partch's tonality diamond described in an earlier post, laid out to correspond with their closest approximations on a conventional keyboard. Many of the notes on the right half are 80/81 of the corresponding notes on the left half. 80/81 is a subtle but audible difference, about a fifth of the distance between adjacent notes on the conventional scale. The contrast sounds interesting. The way it comes about is, on the keyboard's left half, F, B-flat, and E-flat are tuned as a series of exact fourths (4/3 or 2/3) and A, D, and G, respectively, are tuned an exact third in relation to those (5/4 or 5/8); whereas on the right side the opposite occurs: G, D, and A are tuned as a series of exact fifths (3/2 or 3/4) and F, B-flat, and E-flat are tuned a minor sixth (4/5 or 8/5) in relation to those. So these sets of keys in the two keyboard halves are harmonious within themselves, except for the chords C-F on the left half and C-G on the right. My tuning also contains some multiples of 7, which aren't used in standard tuning and are considerably different (flatter) than the corresponding notes on the standard keyboard. For a long time I've been curious what 7/4 (and 11/8 and 13/8) sounds like so it was exciting to try it out... yesterday I probably spent an hour just listening to droning chords with unusual intervals, trying to get an intuition for them. This morning I made a good start on a piece using my new scheme.
This represents the difference between a major third tuned as the ratio 5/4, or tuned as four steps through the circle of fifths (81/64) -- the conventional scale compromises between those two tunings.
I feel a bit like I'm getting sucked into this obsessive subculture of tuning geeks. You can really spend a lot of time doing all this math to calculate frequencies that are only a teeny-tiny distance away from the conventional notes (but make absolutely perfect ratios, without the compromises in the standard 12-equal-divisions tuning... some people really get off on that). I'm still trying to figure out what difference the alternate tunings really make and how to use that difference musically. To get a sense of how deep tuning geekdom can go, just browse this catalog of the 3700+ alternate tunings that come with the Scala software. (Example: the "detempered convex closure of 11-limit diamond in {243/242, 441/440} temperament plane," with 39 tones per octave. Or more simply, there's the "Yugoslavian bagpipe" tuning... for all you Yugoslavs reading this...)
In other random news, I've heard back from two of the venues I contacted regarding future shows. I'm looking at a Halloween party show at The Factory with Carjack! and a show in November at the TrumbullPlex with Emily Bate, though both are tentative now. I'm excited.

